Data Privacy Laws
Members of the public shall not be allowed to gather intelligence, such as BRAININT, MINDINT, THOUGHTINT, or IDEAINT, which could be used to build computer software designed to commit crimes as or towards others. These types of intelligence can only be collected by National governments and reviewed by international governments. These types of intelligence, or rather raw data files, cannot be collected by regional or local governments, due to the complexities involved in the data. However, state governments may be able to collect these types of data in serious complicated cases to rule out suspects under stringent criteria.
Military Technologies, Privacy Laws, and Secrecy Laws
When a crime has been committed, especially towards civilians of their own country, it is legal to go into privacy and classification compartments, and secrecy laws, and secret records, including in the military, to determine and uncover how military technologies have been used to physically or mentally damage an individual, to ensure that their rights are upheld, and even prosecute the individuals that have done the crimes, to ensure they are removed from systematic technologies, and ensure that they are removed from staffing, to ensure that the crimes do not occur towards anyone in the future.
Limiting Government Works in Residences
Legislation should prevent family members in the Federal government from using privacy laws such as FERPA to hide their official activities to conduct business as the Federal government under privacy laws, and then rely on them later in their professional activities at work, or in public, including, however not limited to them previously limiting legal discovery of such conversations or activities in their residences.
Covert Transcripts
Other people should not write in another person's name in covert transcripts, or covertly defined legal transcripts, and artificial intelligence computer programs shall not use any person's name to talk or type or speak or write or transcribe anything at all, literally, that didn't directly originate from the individual, to prevent covert transcript political attacks.
Transcript Fraud
Transcript fraud shall always be prevented by the government, so records are accurate at all times. Transcript fraud may include:
- Swapping of names, such as INDIVIDUAL 1 being named as INDIVIDUAL 2, and INDIVIDUAL 2 being named as INDIVIDUAL 1.
- False attributation, such as:
- Insertion of text or audio or data that doesn't match what the INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION said or did.
- Modifications to correct text or audio or data with incorrect text or audio or data.
- Incorrect text, however correct audio.
- Incorrect audio, however incorrect text.
- False or misleading statements not corrected or crossed off and redacted when verified to be incorrect.
- Audio, text, or data falsely attributed.
- Audio not originating from public speech.
- Visualizations not originating from public visual sightings.
- Thoughts posted as text or audio or data.
- Audio, text, or data that does not match what actually occurred.
- Testimony not originating from INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION, falsely attributed to INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION.
- False admissions.
- Transcript fraud by computer software.
- False or misleading direction or motive of transcript by computer software or third party.
- Legal violations, such as:
- Allowing a defendant to modify something that is correct on the plaintiff's side.
- Modifying or redacting good admissions.
- Hidden text.
- Illegal actions in transcripts.
- Forward looking audio, text, or data.
- Legal text, audio, or data covered up.
- Cherry picking information or intelligence.
- All good information not included in case.
- Hatefully motivated cases.
- Multiple transcripts with similar text, to confuse or cherry pick a transcript later, which was not the original transcript, with or without generated audio.
- Hidden transcripts.
- Transcripts of thoughts, including thoughts forced due to mind control usage, including, however not limited to "MIND CONTROL THOUGHT" not attributed on the transcript, including, however not limited to identifying what computer program and what individual(s) used the same computer program to conduct the MIND CONTROL THOUGHT.
- "he/she thought"
- Transcripts of speech that was actually thoughts, not attributed to MIND READING TECHNOLOGY with or without MIND CONTROL THOUGHT not attributed on the transcript, including, however not limited to identifying what computer program and what individual(s) used the same computer program to conduct the MIND CONTROL THOUGHT.
- "he/she said"
- Manufactured thoughts not corrected attributed to GENERATED MIND CONTROL THOUGHT.
- Fabricated thoughts, or thought data that was not actually thought not correctly attributed to GENERATED THOUGHTS NOT ORIGINATING FROM MIND READING TECHNOLOGY.
- Fake or fabricated transcripts.
- Manufactured transcripts, or transcripts that were manufactured with a specific goal in mind.
- Fabricated transcripts, or transcripts that were just purely generated.
- Transcripts that are falsely attributed to the wrong INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION.
- Manufactured audio, or audio that was generated using MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, including, however not limited to speech out loud, or speech in-person, or speech in active conversational thoughts not originating from any CONVERSATIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAM.
- Fake or fabricated audio, or audio that is generated, such as using a voice signature that makes the audio sound like the same INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION.
- Different transcript that original provided that is damaging.
- False or misleading statements.
- Split transcripts.
- Cascading transcripts.
- Lost transcripts that are good and not damaging.
- Split audio sources.
- Split audio destinations.
- Transcript copying.
- Transcript dicta.
- Cascading audio sources.
- Cascading audio destinations.
- Lost audio that was helpful.
- Duplicated audio.
- Audio splicing.
- Transcript security fraud.
- Forced log off.
- Forced log on.
- Artificial Intelligence computer program posting in any INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION's name in any damaging manner.
- Individual not in any courtroom, unless if individual is a victim.
- Transcript surveillance fraud.
- Transcript duplication.
- Transcript manufacturing.
- Transcript fabrication.
- Transcript text fraud.
- Transcript audio fraud.
- Transcript data fraud.
- Transcript broadcasting.
- Transcript multicasting.
- Political transcripts.
- Intellectual Property theft from thoughts or data or speech.
- Political case references, or bringing up cases that do not involve or pertain to the INDIVIDUAL or ORGANIZATION.
- Making or using computer software that uses any INDIVIDUAL name or any ENTITY name or any ORGANIZATION name.
- Cross-off or redaction fraud.
- Errors:
- Audio, however no text.
- Text, however no audio.
- Disappearing text.
- Audio not heard, however transcribed.
- Audio not directed with full attention to transcript placed on transcript as text or audio, or text or audio regarding speech made to others, while others are not on transcript, or speech to others doesn't pertain to transcript.
- Dissolving Fraud, such as:
- Good legal information being dissolved, or rendered useless.
- Dissolved audio or text restored.
- Privacy Violations, such as:
- Violation of privacy while in bedroom.
- Violation of privacy while in bathroom.
- Violation of privacy while in living room.
- Violation of privacy while in kitchen.
- Violation of privacy while in home.
- Signals intelligence correlation or cross-correlation.
- Invalid or misleading or fraudulent use of name.
- Legal Fraud, such as:
- No advisement of legal rights.
- Not providing an attorney to answer all questions for the plaintiff.
- No attorney physically present.
- Courtroom fraud.
- Uncloseable transcripts.
- Covert audio fraud.
- Use of mind control data to fabricate transcript data.